5 AI Prompts Sales Leaders Actually Use (Not the Ones on Twitter)

Dustin Beaudoin ·

The AI Prompt Problem for Sales Leaders

Most AI prompts for sales leaders are generic. They're SDR scripts, motivational fluff, or tactical tips. They don't address what sales leaders actually need: prompts that surface signal, inconsistencies, and execution risk.

Sales leaders need prompts for:

  • Pipeline reviews — Not generic pipeline summaries
  • Deal inspection — Not generic deal analysis
  • Coaching — Not generic coaching tips
  • Account oversight — Not generic account summaries

Here are 5 AI prompts that sales leaders actually use — for real operating rhythms, with real outputs, used in real practice.

1. Pipeline Review Signal Prompt

When to use: Before pipeline reviews, when you need to surface signal, inconsistencies, and execution risk — not just summarize pipeline data.

What context to include:

  • Pipeline data (deals, stages, amounts, close dates)
  • Rep performance data (activity, conversion, velocity)
  • Account data (account health, engagement, triggers)
  • Historical data (previous quarters, trends, patterns)

The prompt:

You are a sales leader reviewing pipeline for [Team/Rep] for [Period].

Pipeline data:
- Deals: [List deals with stage, amount, close date, account]
- Rep performance: [Activity, conversion, velocity metrics]
- Account data: [Account health, engagement, triggers]
- Historical: [Previous quarters, trends, patterns]

Surface signal:
1. Inconsistencies — What doesn't add up? What's inconsistent?
2. Execution risk — What deals are at risk? Why?
3. Opportunities — What deals could accelerate? What's blocking them?
4. Patterns — What patterns emerge? What's working? What's not?

Focus on signal, not noise. What matters for pipeline health and execution?

What good output looks like:

  • Inconsistencies surfaced (deals that don't add up, data that's inconsistent)
  • Execution risk identified (deals at risk, why they're at risk)
  • Opportunities surfaced (deals that could accelerate, what's blocking them)
  • Patterns identified (what's working, what's not)

What bad output looks like:

  • Generic pipeline summary without signal
  • Inconsistencies that aren't actionable
  • Generic execution risk without specifics
  • Patterns that don't inform action

How leaders use this: Sales leaders use this output to prepare for pipeline reviews, identify deals at risk, surface opportunities, and focus coaching on what matters.

2. Deal Inspection Prompt

When to use: When you need to inspect deals deeply — understand deal health, identify risk, surface opportunities, and inform coaching.

What context to include:

  • Deal data (stage, amount, close date, account)
  • Deal history (interactions, activities, changes)
  • Stakeholder data (stakeholders, relationships, influence)
  • Competitive data (competitors, positioning, relationships)

The prompt:

You are a sales leader inspecting [Deal Name], a [Amount] deal in [Stage] stage.

Deal context:
- Deal data: [Stage, amount, close date, account]
- Deal history: [Interactions, activities, changes over time]
- Stakeholders: [Stakeholders, relationships, influence]
- Competitive: [Competitors, positioning, relationships]

Inspect the deal:
1. Deal health — Is this deal healthy? What indicates health or risk?
2. Stakeholder alignment — Are stakeholders aligned? Who's missing? Who's blocking?
3. Competitive position — Where do we stand? What's our competitive position?
4. Execution risk — What's at risk? What could go wrong? What's blocking progress?

Focus on deal health and execution risk — what matters for deal success?

What good output looks like:

  • Deal health assessment that's specific and actionable
  • Stakeholder alignment that shows who's aligned, who's missing, who's blocking
  • Competitive position that's clear and specific
  • Execution risk that identifies what's at risk and what's blocking progress

What bad output looks like:

  • Generic deal health assessment
  • Stakeholder alignment that doesn't show blockers
  • Generic competitive position
  • Execution risk that's not specific

How leaders use this: Sales leaders use this output to inspect deals deeply, identify risk, surface opportunities, and inform coaching conversations.

3. Coaching Prompt

When to use: When you need to coach reps — identify coaching opportunities, surface patterns, and inform coaching conversations.

What context to include:

  • Rep performance data (activity, conversion, velocity, deals)
  • Deal data (deals, stages, outcomes, patterns)
  • Activity data (calls, emails, meetings, engagement)
  • Historical data (previous performance, trends, patterns)

The prompt:

You are a sales leader coaching [Rep Name] based on their performance.

Rep performance:
- Activity: [Calls, emails, meetings, engagement metrics]
- Conversion: [Conversion rates, stage progression, velocity]
- Deals: [Deals, stages, outcomes, patterns]
- Historical: [Previous performance, trends, patterns]

Identify coaching opportunities:
1. Performance patterns — What patterns emerge? What's working? What's not?
2. Skill gaps — What skills are missing? What's blocking performance?
3. Execution gaps — What execution gaps exist? What's not happening?
4. Coaching priorities — What should we focus on? What will move the needle?

Focus on coaching priorities — what matters for rep performance and development?

What good output looks like:

  • Performance patterns that show what's working and what's not
  • Skill gaps that are specific and actionable
  • Execution gaps that identify what's not happening
  • Coaching priorities that focus on what will move the needle

What bad output looks like:

  • Generic performance patterns
  • Skill gaps that aren't specific
  • Generic execution gaps
  • Coaching priorities that don't focus on what matters

How leaders use this: Sales leaders use this output to identify coaching opportunities, surface patterns, and inform coaching conversations.

4. Account Oversight Prompt

When to use: When you need to oversee accounts — understand account health, identify risk, surface opportunities, and inform account strategy.

What context to include:

  • Account data (account health, engagement, triggers)
  • Deal data (deals, stages, outcomes, patterns)
  • Stakeholder data (stakeholders, relationships, influence)
  • Historical data (previous quarters, trends, patterns)

The prompt:

You are a sales leader overseeing [Account Name], a [Segment] account.

Account context:
- Account health: [Health metrics, engagement, triggers]
- Deals: [Deals, stages, outcomes, patterns]
- Stakeholders: [Stakeholders, relationships, influence]
- Historical: [Previous quarters, trends, patterns]

Oversee the account:
1. Account health — Is this account healthy? What indicates health or risk?
2. Deal health — Are deals healthy? What's at risk? What's blocking progress?
3. Stakeholder health — Are stakeholders engaged? Who's missing? Who's blocking?
4. Execution priorities — What should we focus on? What will move the needle?

Focus on account health and execution priorities — what matters for account success?

What good output looks like:

  • Account health assessment that's specific and actionable
  • Deal health that shows what's at risk and what's blocking progress
  • Stakeholder health that shows who's engaged, who's missing, who's blocking
  • Execution priorities that focus on what will move the needle

What bad output looks like:

  • Generic account health assessment
  • Deal health that doesn't show blockers
  • Generic stakeholder health
  • Execution priorities that don't focus on what matters

How leaders use this: Sales leaders use this output to oversee accounts, identify risk, surface opportunities, and inform account strategy.

5. Team Performance Prompt

When to use: When you need to understand team performance — identify patterns, surface opportunities, and inform team strategy.

What context to include:

  • Team performance data (activity, conversion, velocity, deals)
  • Rep performance data (individual rep performance, patterns)
  • Deal data (deals, stages, outcomes, patterns)
  • Historical data (previous quarters, trends, patterns)

The prompt:

You are a sales leader analyzing team performance for [Team Name] for [Period].

Team performance:
- Activity: [Team activity metrics, calls, emails, meetings]
- Conversion: [Team conversion rates, stage progression, velocity]
- Deals: [Team deals, stages, outcomes, patterns]
- Rep performance: [Individual rep performance, patterns]
- Historical: [Previous quarters, trends, patterns]

Analyze team performance:
1. Performance patterns — What patterns emerge? What's working? What's not?
2. Rep patterns — Which reps are performing? Which aren't? Why?
3. Deal patterns — What deal patterns emerge? What's working? What's not?
4. Execution priorities — What should we focus on? What will move the needle?

Focus on execution priorities — what matters for team performance and success?

What good output looks like:

  • Performance patterns that show what's working and what's not
  • Rep patterns that show which reps are performing and why
  • Deal patterns that show what's working and what's not
  • Execution priorities that focus on what will move the needle

What bad output looks like:

  • Generic performance patterns
  • Rep patterns that don't show why
  • Generic deal patterns
  • Execution priorities that don't focus on what matters

How leaders use this: Sales leaders use this output to understand team performance, identify patterns, surface opportunities, and inform team strategy.

The Bottom Line

Sales leaders need prompts that:

  • Surface signal — Not generic summaries
  • Identify inconsistencies — Not generic analysis
  • Surface execution risk — Not generic risk assessment
  • Inform action — Not generic insights

These 5 prompts work because they:

  • Require specific context — Performance data, deal data, account data
  • Force signal extraction — Surface inconsistencies, risk, opportunities
  • Enable action — Inform coaching, strategy, execution

The challenge: These prompts work for individual analysis, but they don't scale as organizational practice. They require manual data gathering, inconsistent prompting, and lack shared visibility.

The solution: Systems that maintain performance data continuously, enable consistent prompting, and provide shared visibility across the sales organization.

That's how sales leaders use AI prompts — for real operating rhythms, with real outputs, used in real practice.

Ready to Transform Your Account Planning?

See how ChatAE integrates account research, planning, and execution in one unified workflow.

Start Free Trial

Get all of our updates directly to your inbox.